An In-Depth Analysis of “No Oil Change” R22 Refrigerant Alternatives: Performance, Cost, and Long-Term Viability

The R22 Retrofit Landscape: Navigating Beyond the “Drop-In” Myth

The End of an Era: The R22 Phase-Out and Its Market Impact

The landscape of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) has been fundamentally reshaped by the global phase-out of hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) refrigerants, most notably R22. This transition, mandated in the United States by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Montreal Protocol, is driven by the scientific consensus that HCFCs contribute to the depletion of the Earth’s stratospheric ozone layer.¹ As of January 1, 2020, the production and importation of new R22 into the U.S. ceased entirely. Consequently, the servicing of the vast number of existing R22 systems now depends exclusively on a finite and diminishing supply of recovered, recycled, or reclaimed refrigerant.³

This regulatory action has had profound and immediate economic consequences for equipment owners and service contractors. The principles of supply and demand have created a volatile and expensive market for the remaining R22. Prices have surged, with industry reports indicating costs ranging from $200 to $600 per pound.³ For a typical residential system requiring a multi-pound recharge, this can translate to a service cost of $1,500 or more, a figure that is often difficult for clients to justify, especially for older equipment.³ Some HVAC service companies have ceased offering R22 service altogether due to the high cost and scarcity of the refrigerant.³

This economic pressure places owners of aging R22 systems at a critical decision-making crossroads. When a system develops a leak or requires a major repair necessitating a refrigerant recharge, they are faced with three primary options:

1. Repair and Recharge: Absorb the high cost of reclaimed R22 to keep the existing system operational. This is often seen as a short-term fix, particularly if the system is nearing the end of its typical 12-15 year lifespan.³
2. Retrofit: Convert the existing system to operate on an alternative, more readily available, and less expensive refrigerant. This approach aims to extend the life of the current equipment without the capital outlay of a full replacement.
3. Replace: Invest in a new, modern system that uses a currently approved refrigerant, such as R-410A or one of the newer, lower-GWP alternatives. While this involves the highest upfront cost, it offers significant long-term benefits in energy efficiency, reliability, and regulatory compliance.³

The focus of this report is to provide an exhaustive analysis of the second option: retrofitting, specifically with alternatives that are marketed as not requiring a change of the system’s original mineral oil.

Deconstructing the “Drop-In” Myth: Setting Realistic Expectations

The term “drop-in” has become prevalent in the HVAC industry, particularly in marketing materials for R22 alternatives. It implies a simple, direct replacement that can be added to a system with minimal effort. However, it is imperative to establish a clear and technically accurate understanding from the outset: according to leading equipment manufacturers and refrigerant experts, there are no true “drop-in” replacements for R22.⁵

This widely held misconception stems from the historical transition away from chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) like R12. During that phase-out, interim HCFC-based blends were developed that had a high degree of miscibility with the mineral oil used in CFC systems. This compatibility made the retrofits relatively simple, leading to the “drop-in” moniker.⁹ The term has since been co-opted and applied to the current R22 phase-out, but the underlying chemistry is vastly different and far more complex.

In the modern context, “drop-in” has been repurposed by some suppliers to describe a category of HFC-based refrigerants that, under specific conditions, may not require a complete and laborious change of the system’s original mineral (MO) or alkylbenzene (AB) oil to a synthetic polyolester (POE) oil.⁹ This distinction is critical. A “no oil change” alternative is

not a “top-off” fluid. It is illegal and technically unsound to mix any of these alternative refrigerants with an existing R22 charge.¹⁰ Doing so contaminates the refrigerant, makes system performance unpredictable, and renders any future recovery efforts problematic, as the resulting mixture cannot be reclaimed.¹¹

The marketing simplification of the term “drop-in” creates a significant potential for error and risk. A technician who interprets the term literally might be led to perform an improper top-off, which would compromise the system, violate regulations, and deliver poor results to the client. Therefore, this report will proceed with the technically correct framework: these refrigerants are candidates for a less complex retrofit procedure, not a zero-effort replacement. Every alternative requires, at a minimum, the complete recovery of the old R22 charge and a specific, methodical process to introduce the new refrigerant.³ Understanding this distinction is the first and most crucial step in successfully navigating the R22 retrofit landscape.

The Core Technical Hurdle: Oil Miscibility and the Hydrocarbon Solution

The central challenge in retrofitting an R22 system with a modern hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) blend lies in a fundamental principle of chemistry: oil miscibility. The HFC refrigerants that form the basis of R22 alternatives are chemically immiscible, meaning they do not mix, with the traditional mineral oil (MO) or alkylbenzene (AB) lubricants found in the vast majority of R22 systems.⁹

This lack of miscibility poses a direct threat to the heart of the system: the compressor. In a properly operating system, the refrigerant acts as a carrier for the oil, ensuring it circulates from the compressor, through the condenser and evaporator, and back to the compressor crankcase to provide continuous lubrication. When an immiscible HFC refrigerant is introduced into a system with mineral oil, this circulation breaks down. The heavier oil separates from the refrigerant, tending to pool in the low-pressure side of the system, particularly in the evaporator. This phenomenon, known as “oil logging,” has two detrimental effects: it coats the inside of the evaporator tubing, impeding heat transfer and reducing system capacity, and more critically, it starves the compressor of lubrication, leading to increased wear, overheating, and eventual catastrophic failure.⁵

To overcome this critical hurdle, manufacturers of “no oil change” R22 alternatives have engineered a clever workaround. They incorporate a small percentage of specific hydrocarbons (HCs)—typically isobutane (R-600a), n-butane (R-600), or isopentane (R-601a)—into the HFC blend.⁴ These HCs act as a solvent or compatibility agent. They are miscible with the mineral oil and effectively “soak” into it, thinning the oil and reducing its viscosity. This thinned oil mixture is then more easily entrained and carried along by the flow of the primary HFC refrigerant, facilitating its return to the compressor.¹⁴

However, this engineered solution is not a panacea, and its effectiveness is highly dependent on the design and complexity of the system. While the HC additive greatly improves oil circulation, it does not create true miscibility. A crucial technical limitation remains: the thinned mineral oil/HC mixture will still not mix with the liquid HFC refrigerant on the high-pressure side of the system.¹⁴ This means that in systems with components that hold a significant volume of liquid refrigerant, such as a liquid receiver, a layer of oil can still separate and become trapped, impeding circulation.¹⁴

This reality is reflected in the detailed retrofit guidelines from numerous manufacturers. While they market their products as “no oil change,” their technical documents almost universally include caveats. For systems with long or complex piping runs, significant vertical risers (where the evaporator is located above the compressor), or those equipped with liquid receivers or large accumulators (common in heat pumps), the guidelines frequently recommend the addition of a small amount (typically 15-25%) of POE oil to the existing mineral oil charge to ensure adequate oil return.¹³ This means the “no oil change” claim is conditional and subject to a risk assessment of the specific system being serviced. A simple, close-coupled residential split system is a low-risk candidate, while a large commercial system with a receiver and long line sets is a high-risk candidate where relying solely on the HC additive may not be sufficient for long-term compressor reliability.

Comprehensive Profiles of R22 “No Oil Change” Alternatives

This section provides detailed profiles of the most common R22 alternative refrigerants marketed as being compatible with mineral oil. Each profile covers technical specifications, performance characteristics relative to R22, and manufacturer guidance on oil compatibility and retrofitting.

Freon™ MO99 (R-438A): The Capacity King

Overview

Marketed by The Chemours Company, Freon™ MO99 (ASHRAE designation R-438A) is one of the most prominent and widely-used “no oil change” R22 alternatives. Its primary market distinction is its performance, which is frequently cited as the closest overall match to R22, particularly in maintaining cooling capacity in air conditioning applications.3 This makes it a favored choice for technicians aiming to minimize any perceptible change in system performance after a retrofit.

Technical Specifications

• Composition (wt%): R-438A is a five-part zeotropic blend consisting of R-32 (8.5%), R-125 (45%), R-134a (44.2%), R-600 (isobutane, 1.7%), and R-601a (isopentane, 0.6%).²²
• GWP (Global Warming Potential): The AR4 GWP is 2265.²² This is higher than R22’s GWP of 1810.²³
• ODP (Ozone Depletion Potential): 0.²² R-438A is an HFC blend and contains no chlorine.
• Temperature Glide: Approximately 6°F to 7°F (or 6.25 K).²² This is a moderate glide that must be accounted for during charging and diagnostics.
• Safety Classification: ASHRAE A1, indicating it is non-toxic and non-flammable under standard conditions.¹⁰

Performance vs. R22

• Capacity: R-438A provides the closest capacity match to R22 among many leading “no oil change” refrigerants.¹⁰ This is a significant advantage, as it means properly sized equipment will continue to cool the space effectively with similar compressor run times, making the change largely unnoticeable to the end-user.¹⁰
• Efficiency: The energy efficiency, or Coefficient of Performance (COP), is comparable to that of R22 in most systems.²⁵
• Pressures & Flow: R-438A is designed to have operating pressures and a mass flow rate that are very similar to R22.¹⁰ This close match minimizes the likelihood that expansion devices, such as thermostatic expansion valves (TXVs) or capillary tubes, will need to be changed, particularly in standard air conditioning systems.²⁵
• Discharge Temperature: A key benefit is a significantly lower compressor discharge temperature compared to R22.⁸ This can reduce thermal stress on the compressor and oil, potentially extending the life of the compressor.²⁷

Oil Compatibility

R-438A is compatible with traditional mineral oil (MO) and alkylbenzene (AB) lubricants, as well as synthetic POE oil.10 The inclusion of hydrocarbons (R-600 and R-601a) promotes the return of mineral oil to the compressor. Chemours states that for most systems, an oil change is not required.21 However, their official guidelines recommend monitoring the compressor oil level during start-up. If oil return appears erratic or the level consistently drops, the addition of POE oil is recommended to stabilize the system.28

Retrofit Notes

A proper retrofit with R-438A is not a simple “top-off.” The procedure requires full recovery of the R22 charge, replacement of the liquid line filter-drier, and replacement of critical elastomeric seals like Schrader valve cores.10 The system must be evacuated to a deep vacuum. R-438A must be charged as a liquid to prevent fractionation. The initial charge should be around 85% of the original R22 nameplate charge, with the final charge weight typically settling around 95% after tuning for proper superheat and subcooling.28

ComStar RS-44b (R-453A): The Low-GWP Contender

Overview

Marketed by ComStar International, RS-44b (ASHRAE designation R-453A) is positioned as a leading “true drop-in” replacement for R22. Its key marketing advantages are its claim of having an equal flow rate to R22 and possessing the lowest Global Warming Potential (GWP) among the most common HFC-based “no oil change” alternatives.23 It is an improved version of the older RS-44 (R-424A) and is suitable for both air conditioning and refrigeration applications down to evaporator temperatures of -20°F.30

Technical Specifications

• Composition: R-453A is a zeotropic HFC/HC blend.³²
• GWP (Global Warming Potential): There is a discrepancy in reported values. ComStar and some sources list an AR4 GWP of 1664.²³ Other technical sources and EPA documentation cite a GWP of 1765.³⁰ In either case, its GWP is lower than most other HFC alternatives and is comparable to or slightly lower than R22’s GWP of 1810.²³
• ODP (Ozone Depletion Potential): 0.²⁹ R-453A is an HFC blend.
• Temperature Glide: Approximately 4.2 K.²³ This is a relatively low glide compared to other options.
• Safety Classification: ASHRAE A1, indicating low toxicity and non-flammability.²⁹

Performance vs. R22

• Capacity & Efficiency: The manufacturer claims that R-453A provides equal cooling capacity and has an equal flow rate to R22.²³ Some analyses suggest it has a slightly higher Coefficient of Performance (COP), indicating potentially lower energy consumption than R22.³⁰
• Pressures & Flow: R-453A is designed to operate at a discharge pressure very similar to R22. This pressure is notably lower than that of many other alternatives like R-407C and R-422D, which reduces stress on the compressor and system components.²⁹ The similar mass flow rate makes it highly compatible with existing TXVs and capillary tubes.²⁹
• Discharge Temperature: R-453A exhibits a slightly lower discharge temperature than R22, which is beneficial for compressor longevity.³⁰

Oil Compatibility

R-453A is fully compatible with mineral oil (MO), alkylbenzene (AB), and POE lubricants.23 The manufacturer states that no changes to the oil or any system components are required for a successful retrofit.19 This is the basis for its “true drop-in” marketing claim.

Retrofit Notes

The retrofit procedure involves a full recovery of R22. R-453A must be charged from the cylinder in liquid form to prevent fractionation.19 The initial charge should be up to 90% of the original R22 charge weight. The system should then be started and tuned by adjusting for proper operating pressures and temperatures. The manufacturer notes that in Europe, where regulations differ, accidental mixing of RS-44b with R22 has been observed with no harm to system components; however, this practice is not permitted by the EPA in the United States and is strongly discouraged.29

NU-22B (R-422B): The Versatile Workhorse

Overview

R-422B, commonly marketed as NU-22B, is a widely available HFC blend that serves as a general-purpose replacement for R22. It is applied across a broad range of equipment, including residential and commercial air conditioning, supermarket refrigeration systems, and ice machines.17 It is often presented as a straightforward, cost-effective retrofit solution.

Technical Specifications

• Composition (wt%): R-422B is a three-part zeotropic blend of R-125 (55%), R-134a (42%), and R-600a (isobutane, 3%).¹⁵
• GWP (Global Warming Potential): The AR4 GWP is 2525.¹⁵
• ODP (Ozone Depletion Potential): 0.¹⁵
• Temperature Glide: Approximately 5°F.¹⁰
• Safety Classification: ASHRAE A1, non-toxic and non-flammable.¹⁵

Performance vs. R22

• Capacity & Efficiency: In air conditioning and medium-temperature refrigeration applications, R-422B provides cooling capacity and efficiency similar to R22.³³ However, its performance can diminish at lower temperatures, with a potential capacity reduction of up to 10% in low-temperature refrigeration applications.¹⁵
• Pressures & Flow: R-422B has a lower discharge temperature than R22, which is beneficial for the compressor.¹⁰ Its mass flow rate is approximately 20% higher than R22’s.¹⁰ This significant difference in mass flow means that in some systems, particularly those operating close to the limit of their expansion device, a TXV adjustment or replacement may be necessary to achieve optimal performance.¹⁰
• Discharge Temperature: The discharge temperature is significantly lower than R22, in the range of -30°F to -37°F below R22’s typical operating point, which reduces the risk of oil breakdown.¹⁰

Oil Compatibility

R-422B is compatible with MO, AB, and POE oils.33 The isobutane component is included to promote mineral oil return.17 For most standard, close-coupled systems, an oil change is not necessary.33 However, for systems with more complicated piping, large internal volumes, or known oil return issues, the addition of some POE oil may be required to ensure reliable lubrication.17

Retrofit Notes

R-422B is marketed as a “drop-in” replacement designed to minimize downtime.33 The standard retrofit procedure applies: full R22 recovery, filter-drier replacement, and a deep vacuum. It is critical to charge R-422B as a liquid from the cylinder to maintain the correct blend composition.33 Topping off an R22 system is not permissible; the old charge must be fully evacuated first.33

Genetron®/Freon™ MO29 (R-422D): The Refrigeration Specialist

Overview

R-422D, marketed under trade names like Genetron® 422D and Freon™ MO29, is an HFC/HC blend often positioned as a strong candidate for retrofitting low- and medium-temperature direct expansion (DX) refrigeration systems, such as supermarket cases and walk-in coolers.27 It is also used in stationary air conditioning and DX water chillers.

Technical Specifications

• Composition (wt%): R-422D is a three-part blend of R-125 (65.1%), R-134a (31.5%), and R-600a (isobutane, 3.4%).⁴
• GWP (Global Warming Potential): The AR4 GWP is 2729, which is among the highest of the common R22 alternatives.⁴
• ODP (Ozone Depletion Potential): 0.²⁷
• Temperature Glide: Approximately 5°F (or 2.3 K), which is considered a relatively small glide.¹⁰
• Safety Classification: ASHRAE A1, non-toxic and non-flammable.²⁷

Performance vs. R22

• Capacity & Efficiency: Performance data for R-422D is mixed and highly application-dependent. The manufacturer claims it can offer up to 8% improved cooling capacity and 14% improved efficiency over R22 in low-temperature conditions.²⁷ However, in medium-temperature A/C applications, it may have a slightly lower cooling capacity (around 5%).²⁷ In contrast, independent thermodynamic analyses have found that R-422D has the highest mass flow rate and lowest exergy efficiency of several alternatives, leading some researchers to classify it as a “least desirable option” from a pure performance standpoint.³⁵
• Pressures & Flow: The most significant characteristic of R-422D is its mass flow rate, which is approximately 32% higher than that of R22.¹⁰ This substantial difference makes it more likely that the existing expansion device (TXV or fixed orifice) may be undersized and require adjustment or replacement to avoid restricting flow and harming performance.¹⁰
• Discharge Temperature: Like other alternatives, R-422D provides a lower discharge temperature than R22, which may prolong compressor life.¹⁸

Oil Compatibility

R-422D is compatible with MO, AB, and POE oils.27 While it can be used with the existing mineral oil in systems with short, simple piping, an oil change or the addition of POE is frequently recommended to ensure adequate oil return.13 For systems containing liquid receivers or low-side accumulators, a higher ratio of POE to mineral oil is advised.13

Retrofit Notes

The high mass flow rate is the primary consideration for any R-422D retrofit. Technicians must carefully evaluate the expansion device and be prepared to make adjustments or replacements.10 The standard retrofit procedure of recovery, filter-drier replacement, and deep vacuum must be followed. R-422D must be charged as a liquid.

Other Notable Alternatives

A number of other refrigerants are marketed as “no oil change” R22 alternatives, each with distinct properties.

• R-421A (Choice™): This is a simple two-part blend of R-125 and R-134a.⁸ It is compatible with MO, AB, and POE oils.⁸ Its GWP is 2600.⁴⁰ A key consideration is its mass flow, which is about 21% higher than R22, suggesting a moderate possibility of needing TXV adjustments.¹⁰
• R-427A (Forane®): Marketed by Arkema as an “EASY RETROFIT,” R-427A’s main advantage is that its operating pressures are nearly identical to R22.⁴¹ Its GWP is 2138.⁴² However, its status as a “no oil change” refrigerant is highly conditional. Arkema’s own guidelines strongly recommend either a partial (20%) or complete change to POE oil for reliable oil return in many common scenarios, including systems with long line sets, tandem compressors, or Trane 3-D scroll compressors.²⁰ It also has a significant temperature glide of approximately 9°F, which requires careful attention during charging.⁴⁴
• R-458A (Bluon TdX 20): A more recent entry, R-458A is a five-component HFC blend.⁸ Its proponents claim it delivers significant energy savings (an average of 15% over R22) while maintaining virtually identical cooling capacity (+/- 3%).⁸ It is compatible with both MO and POE oil and operates at lower pressures and temperatures than R22.⁸
• R-424A (RS-44): This is an older HFC/HC blend that has been largely superseded in the market by the improved RS-44b (R-453A).³¹ It is compatible with MO, AB, and POE oils and has a GWP of 2440.¹⁶
• A Note on R-407C: This refrigerant is frequently mentioned in discussions of R22 alternatives and offers a good performance match for air conditioning.⁷ However, it is crucial to note that
  R-407C is not a “no oil change” option. It is immiscible with mineral oil and absolutely requires a complete, and often laborious, system flush and change to POE oil for proper operation.⁶ It is included here only to clarify this critical distinction and explain why it does not meet the primary criteria of this report.

Comparative Analysis and Decision Framework

Choosing the right R22 alternative requires a multi-faceted analysis that balances technical performance, environmental impact, cost, and system-specific risks. This section synthesizes the data from the individual profiles into comparative tools to facilitate an informed decision.

At-a-Glance Comparison: Key Metrics for R22 Alternatives

The following table provides a consolidated, side-by-side comparison of the leading “no oil change” R22 alternatives against the R22 baseline. This allows for rapid evaluation of the most critical metrics.

Refrigerant (ASHRAE #, Name)	Composition (wt%)	ODP	GWP (AR4)	Glide (°F / K)	Safety	Oil Compatibility	Capacity vs. R22	Efficiency vs. R22	Mass Flow vs. R22	TXV Change Likely?
R-22 (Baseline)	100% CHClF2	0.055	1810	0 / 0	A1	MO, AB	100%	100%	100%	N/A
R-438A (Freon™ MO99)	R32/125/134a/600/601a (8.5/45/44.2/1.7/0.6)	0	2265	~7 / ~4	A1	MO, AB, POE	~95-100%	Comparable	~100-105%	Unlikely in A/C
R-453A (RS-44b)	HFC/HC Blend	0	1664-1765	~7.6 / 4.2	A1	MO, AB, POE	~100%	Comparable to higher	~100%	No
R-422B (NU-22B®)	R125/134a/600a (55/42/3)	0	2525	~5 / ~3	A1	MO, AB, POE	~90-100%	Comparable	~120%	Possible
R-422D (Freon™ MO29)	R125/134a/600a (65.1/31.5/3.4)	0	2729	~5 / ~3	A1	MO, AB, POE	~95-108%	Lower to higher	~132%	Likely
R-421A (Choice™)	R125/134a	0	2600	~7 / ~4	A1	MO, AB, POE	~90-95%	Lower	~121%	Possible
R-427A (Forane®)	R32/125/143a/134a (15/25/10/50)	0	2138	~9 / ~5	A1	MO, AB, POE*	~95%	Comparable	~108%	No
R-458A (Bluon TdX 20)	5-part HFC Blend	0	N/A	Low	A1	MO, POE	~97-103%	Higher (avg. 15%)	N/A	No
R-424A (RS-44)	R125/134a/600a/600/601a (50.5/47/0.9/1/0.6)	0	2440	~7.2 / 4	A1	MO, AB, POE	~95%	Lower	~112%	Possible

Note on R-427A: While compatible, the manufacturer strongly recommends a partial or full POE oil change for reliable oil return in many common system configurations.²⁰

Data compiled from sources:.4

The Bottom Line: Market Cost Analysis

The primary driver for seeking an R22 alternative is economic. The cost of virgin R22 has made routine servicing prohibitively expensive. The following table provides a snapshot of the market pricing for 25 lb cylinders of the most common “no oil change” alternatives, demonstrating the significant and immediate cost savings of retrofitting.

Refrigerant (ASHRAE #, Name)	Low Price ($)	High Price ($)	Average Price ($)	Average Price per Pound ($/lb)
R-22 (Reclaimed)	$475 (10 lbs)	$600 (10 lbs)	~$53.75/lb	$53.75
R-438A (Freon™ MO99)	$325.00	$325.00	$325.00	$13.00
R-453A (RS-44b)	$549.95	$625.00	$587.48	$23.50
R-422B (NU-22B®)	$320.00	$495.00	$402.65	$16.11
R-422D (Freon™ MO29)	$465.95	$509.00	$487.48	$19.50
R-421A (Choice™)	$280.00	$429.00	$349.33	$13.97
R-427A (Forane®)	$419.97	$599.00	$509.32	$20.37
R-458A (Bluon TdX 20)	$525.00	$525.00	$525.00	$21.00
R-407C (POE Required)	$325.00	$536.00	$445.00	$17.80

Prices are based on listed online retail costs for 25 lb cylinders (or equivalent for R22) as of late 2024 and are subject to market fluctuation. They do not include shipping, taxes, or hazmat fees. R-407C is included for price comparison purposes only.

Data compiled from sources:.3

The financial imperative is clear. Even the most expensive alternative refrigerant, at around $24 per pound, is less than half the cost of reclaimed R22. The most affordable options are nearly four times cheaper. This stark economic difference is the single most compelling argument for a system owner to choose retrofitting over recharging with R22, as the cost of the refrigerant for the retrofit can be substantially less than the cost of a single R22 recharge.

System-Based Risk Assessment for Oil Return

The promise of a “no oil change” retrofit is conditional. The effectiveness of the hydrocarbon additive in ensuring mineral oil return is highly dependent on the physical characteristics of the HVAC system. The following table provides a framework for assessing this risk, guiding the technician on whether to proceed with caution or to recommend a partial POE oil charge for long-term reliability.

System Type / Component	Risk Level for MO/AB Oil Return	Recommended Action	Rationale
Small Residential Split System (Short, simple line set < 50 ft)	Low	Proceed with existing oil. Monitor compressor oil level closely during the first hours of operation.	Simple, close-coupled systems have the highest probability of successful oil return without modification. 17
Rooftop Unit (RTU) (Close-coupled package unit)	Low to Moderate	Proceed with existing oil. Pay close attention to oil level monitoring post-retrofit.	While compact, some RTUs can have complex internal piping. The risk is generally low but warrants careful observation. 20
System with Long Line Sets (> 75 ft) or Complex Piping	Moderate to High	Partial POE charge (15-25%) is recommended. Add 10% POE initially, then add in 5% increments if oil level remains unstable.	Long horizontal runs and numerous bends increase the chances of oil getting trapped. The HC additive may not be sufficient to ensure return over these distances. 19
System with Significant Vertical Risers (Evaporator > 5 ft above compressor)	High	Partial POE charge (15-25%) is strongly recommended.	Pushing oil vertically against gravity is a significant challenge for immiscible fluids. POE provides the necessary miscibility to help lift the oil back to the compressor. 20
System with a Liquid Receiver	High	Partial POE charge (15-25%) is strongly recommended.	The receiver is a major potential trap for oil. The immiscible MO can separate and accumulate at the bottom, preventing it from circulating. 13
Systems with Tandem, Screw, or Trane 3-D Scroll Compressors	Very High	A complete oil change to POE is required.	These compressor types have specific lubrication requirements and geometries that are incompatible with relying on an HC additive for oil return. Manufacturer guidelines are explicit on this point. 20

This framework synthesizes guidance from multiple manufacturer documents.¹³ Always consult the specific refrigerant manufacturer’s guidelines and the OEM’s recommendations before proceeding.

A Unified Best-Practice Guide for R22 Retrofitting

A successful and reliable R22 retrofit is not a matter of simply swapping gases. It is a methodical technical procedure that requires attention to detail at every step. This guide consolidates best practices from multiple refrigerant and equipment manufacturers into a single, unified workflow. Following these steps is critical to ensure system performance, reliability, and safety.

Step 1: Pre-Retrofit Assessment & Baseline Data Collection

Before any refrigerant is handled, a thorough assessment of the system is paramount.

• Establish Baseline Performance: If the system is operational, record a complete set of baseline data while it is still running on R22. This includes suction and discharge pressures, evaporator and condenser temperatures, superheat at the evaporator outlet, subcooling at the condenser outlet, and compressor amperage draw.¹³ This data is not just for records; it becomes the target you will aim for when tuning the system with the new refrigerant.
• Diagnose Existing Issues: A retrofit will not fix underlying problems. If the system is not performing correctly on R22, identify and correct the root cause first.²⁰ Common issues like dirty coils, poor airflow, or a failing fan motor will only be exacerbated by a refrigerant change.
• Perform a Thorough Leak Check: Use a quality electronic leak detector or other preferred method to check the entire system for leaks before recovering the R22.⁴⁹ The primary reason for a retrofit is often a leak; that leak must be located and repaired as part of the process.

Step 2: Refrigerant Recovery & Component Replacement

This step involves safely removing the old charge and replacing key components that are critical for the new refrigerant’s performance and longevity.

• Recover the R22 Charge: Using an EPA-approved recovery machine, recover the entire R22 charge into a dedicated, clearly labeled recovery cylinder. Do not vent the refrigerant, as it is illegal and environmentally harmful.⁵ Weigh the amount of R22 recovered; this weight will serve as a crucial reference for calculating the initial charge of the new refrigerant.²⁸
• Replace the Liquid Line Filter-Drier: This is a non-negotiable step in any retrofit.¹⁰ The desiccant material (drying agent) in an old R22 filter-drier may be incompatible with HFC refrigerant blends and their associated oils. Furthermore, it is standard best practice to replace the drier any time a refrigeration system is opened to the atmosphere.
• Replace Critical Seals: It is highly recommended to replace accessible elastomeric (rubber) seals, particularly the Schrader valve cores and any service valve caps.¹⁰ The materials used in older R22 systems may not be compatible with HFCs and can degrade, swell, or leak over time.

Step 3: System Evacuation

Proper evacuation is essential to remove moisture and non-condensable gases (like air and nitrogen) that can severely impact system performance and damage components.

• Pull a Deep Vacuum: Connect a high-quality vacuum pump to both the high and low sides of the system. Evacuating from only the low-side port is insufficient and will not adequately remove moisture and non-condensables from the entire system.¹³
• Use a Micron Gauge: Evacuate the system to a deep vacuum of 500 microns or less.³⁷ This level of vacuum cannot be accurately measured with standard analog manifold gauges. A digital micron gauge is the only tool that can confirm a proper dehydration vacuum has been achieved.¹³
• Perform a Standing Vacuum Test: Once the target vacuum is reached, isolate the system from the vacuum pump and monitor the micron gauge for 15-30 minutes. If the pressure rises significantly, it indicates a leak that must be found and repaired before charging.⁴⁹

Step 4: Charging the New Refrigerant

The method of charging is fundamentally different for blended refrigerants compared to a single-component refrigerant like R22.

• Charge as a Liquid Only: This is the most critical rule of charging blended refrigerants. The cylinder must be inverted to ensure that only liquid refrigerant is removed and charged into the high side of the system.¹⁰ Charging as a vapor will cause the different components of the blend, which have different boiling points, to separate. This process, called fractionation, will alter the composition of the refrigerant entering the system, leading to incorrect pressures, poor performance, and making the P/T chart inaccurate.
• Calculate the Initial Charge: Do not charge the full amount of the original R22 weight. As a starting point, charge the system with 85-90% of the R22 charge weight that was recovered in Step 2.¹⁹ For example, if 5.0 lbs of R22 were recovered, the initial charge of the new refrigerant would be approximately 4.5 lbs.

Step 5: System Start-Up, Tuning, and Final Charge

This is where the technician’s skill and the baseline data from Step 1 become invaluable.

• Stabilize the System: Start the system and allow it to run and stabilize for at least 20 minutes to allow pressures and temperatures to normalize.²⁰
• Mastering Temperature Glide: All R22 alternative blends are zeotropic, meaning they have a temperature glide. This glide is the temperature difference between when the refrigerant starts to boil (bubble point) and when it finishes boiling (dew point). This fundamentally changes how superheat and subcooling are measured.

• To calculate superheat, measure the suction line temperature and subtract the dew point temperature (vapor saturation) corresponding to the suction pressure on the P/T chart.⁴⁴
• To calculate subcooling, measure the bubble point temperature (liquid saturation) corresponding to the head pressure and subtract the liquid line temperature.⁴⁴
• Do not rely on the liquid line sight glass. Bubbles in the sight glass of a system with a blended refrigerant are often a normal consequence of the temperature glide and are not a reliable indicator of an undercharged system.⁴⁴ Charging must be done by achieving the target superheat and subcooling.

• Adjust the Final Charge: Compare the new operating conditions to the R22 baseline data. If the system appears undercharged (e.g., high superheat, low subcooling), add the new refrigerant in small increments (e.g., 5% of the original R22 charge weight at a time), allowing the system to stabilize after each addition until the target superheat and subcooling values are met.²⁸ The final charge weight will typically be between 90% and 100% of the original R22 charge.²⁸
• Monitor Oil Level: Throughout the start-up and tuning process, carefully monitor the oil level in the compressor’s sight glass (if available). If the oil level is consistently low or fluctuates wildly, it is a sign of poor oil return. In this case, adding a small amount of POE oil as per the risk assessment in Section 3.3 is warranted.¹⁹

Step 6: Labeling and Documentation

This final step is crucial for safety and future serviceability.

• Label the System: Affix a new, durable label to the unit in a visible location. The label must clearly identify the refrigerant type (e.g., “R-438A”) and the lubricant type in the system (e.g., “Mineral Oil” or “MO + POE”).¹¹ This prevents accidental mixing of refrigerants or oils during future service calls.
• Document the Service: Record the final charge weight, operating pressures, temperatures, superheat, and subcooling in the service record for the equipment.

Strategic Recommendations and Future Outlook

Making the decision to retrofit an R22 system involves weighing immediate costs against long-term performance, reliability, and the evolving regulatory environment. This final section provides strategic guidance to help contractors and equipment owners make the most prudent choice.

Choosing Your Retrofit: A Scenario-Based Approach

There is no single “best” R22 alternative; the optimal choice depends entirely on the specific priorities for a given project. Based on the comprehensive data presented, the decision can be guided by the following scenarios:

• If the priority is… Closest Cooling Capacity:
• R-438A (Freon™ MO99) is the leading candidate. It is consistently documented as having the closest capacity and mass flow match to R22, minimizing the risk of a noticeable performance drop and the need for expansion device changes in standard A/C systems.¹⁰ This makes it an excellent choice for applications where maintaining comfort levels is the paramount concern.
• If the priority is… Lowest Environmental Impact (GWP):
• R-453A (RS-44b) is the clear winner among the common HFC options. With a GWP around 1664-1765, it is significantly lower than its peers and even slightly below R22 itself.²³ For clients who are environmentally conscious or operate in jurisdictions with potential future carbon taxes, R-453A offers a more responsible HFC-based solution.
• If the priority is… Lowest Upfront Refrigerant Cost:
• R-421A (Choice™) and R-422B (NU-22B®) frequently appear at the lower end of the price spectrum for a 25 lb cylinder.³⁹ For purely budget-driven decisions where a slight performance trade-off is acceptable, these refrigerants offer the most economical path to getting a system back online. However, their higher mass flow rates mean a greater potential for added labor costs if TXV adjustments are needed.
• If the priority is… Simplicity and Pressure Match:
• R-427A (Forane®) offers operating pressures that are nearly identical to R22, which can simplify the tuning process.⁴¹ However, this simplicity is offset by the manufacturer’s strong recommendations to add or fully change to POE oil in many common system types, making its “no oil change” status tenuous in practice and potentially increasing the overall cost and complexity of the retrofit.²⁰

The Long-Term View: A Bridge, Not a Destination

It is crucial to frame the decision to retrofit within a broader strategic context. An HFC-based retrofit is not a permanent solution; it is a bridge technology.

First, even the best alternative refrigerant will likely result in a slight degradation of performance or efficiency compared to how the system operated with R22, the refrigerant for which it was originally designed and optimized.¹¹ Second, the long-term reliability of running these HFC blends with the original mineral oil, while possible in many systems, carries an inherent and undeniable risk of inadequate lubrication over time. This risk increases with system complexity and age.⁵ While the HC additive is an effective aid, a full flush and change to POE oil, though expensive and time-consuming, remains the most technically robust method for ensuring long-term compressor health when converting to an HFC refrigerant.

Most importantly, the regulatory landscape continues to shift. The very HFC refrigerants discussed in this report, while solving the immediate ozone-depletion problem of R22, have high Global Warming Potentials and are themselves the target of the next wave of environmental regulation. The AIM Act in the U.S. mandates a steep phase-down of HFC production and consumption. R-410A, the primary refrigerant that replaced R22 in new equipment, is already being phased out of new systems in favor of lower-GWP alternatives like HFOs (hydrofluoroolefins) and natural refrigerants.⁵³

This means that a retrofit to an HFC like R-438A or R-453A is not a 20-year solution. It is a strategic choice to extend the life of an existing asset for perhaps another 5 to 10 years, deferring a major capital expenditure. Eventually, that equipment will need to be replaced with a new system designed for the next generation of environmentally friendly refrigerants.

Final Recommendation

Based on a holistic review of the technical, economic, and regulatory factors, the following recommendations can be made:

1. For R22 systems older than 15 years, or those requiring major repairs (e.g., compressor or coil replacement): A full system replacement is almost always the most prudent financial choice. While the upfront cost is higher, a new, modern unit will be 20-40% more energy-efficient, significantly lowering operating costs. It will also offer improved reliability, a new warranty, and compliance with current and near-future refrigerant regulations.³
2. For R22 systems between 10-15 years old that are in good working condition but require a refrigerant recharge: A “no oil change” retrofit is a viable and cost-effective strategy to extend the equipment’s service life and defer capital expenditure. The choice of refrigerant should be based on the priorities outlined above, with R-438A being the top choice for maintaining capacity and R-453A being the best choice for reducing GWP. The retrofit must be performed according to the strict best-practice guide detailed in Section 4.
3. For all systems, regardless of the path chosen: The single most important factor in maximizing lifespan, efficiency, and reliability is continuous, professional maintenance.⁶ Regular service to clean coils, check charges, and ensure proper operation can prevent minor issues from becoming catastrophic failures and is the best investment an owner can make in their HVAC equipment.

Works cited

1. R-22 Safety Data Sheet – National Refrigerants, Inc., accessed June 27, 2025, https://refrigerants.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/SDS-R22.pdf
2. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF R22 AND ITS SUBSTITUTES IN AIR CONDITIONERS – Semantic Scholar, accessed June 27, 2025, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4590/2f330ee6354cfed9b7a0f8da07f83fea92a2.pdf
3. R22 Replacement: What You Need To Know (2025) – Today’s Homeowner, accessed June 27, 2025, https://todayshomeowner.com/hvac/guides/r22-replacement/
4. Guide to Alternative Refrigerants – Honeywell Advanced Materials, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.honeywell-refrigerants.com/europe/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Honeywell-genetron-guide-to-alternative-refrigerants1.pdf
5. What You Need to Know About R-22 – Trane, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.trane.com/content/dam/Trane/Commercial/global/services/OperateMaintain/REFR-SLB002-EN_09232021.pdf
6. Why Should I Care About the R-22 Phase Out? – Lennox, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.lennox.com/residential/lennox-life/tips-maintenance/why-should-i-care-about-the-r22-phase-out
7. Need my ac unit charged, r22 is discontinued? What are my options? : r/hvacadvice – Reddit, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/hvacadvice/comments/111fmcp/need_my_ac_unit_charged_r22_is_discontinued_what/
8. REPLACEMENT OPTIONS FOR R-22 REFRIGERANT – RK – Mechanical, accessed June 27, 2025, https://rkindustries.com/replacement-options-for-r-22-refrigerant/
9. The “drop in” replacement for R-22/R22 myth | Arkema Forane, accessed June 27, 2025, https://forane.arkema.com/en/forane-refrigerants/forane-retrofits/the-drop-in-myth/
10. R22 Refrigerant Replacement Options | HD Supply, accessed June 27, 2025, https://hdsupplysolutions.com/s/R22_alternatives
11. R22 Retrofit Tips – HVAC School, accessed June 27, 2025, http://www.hvacrschool.com/r22-retrofit-tips/
12. Repairman put 407c in my R-22 system : r/refrigeration – Reddit, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/refrigeration/comments/fv3ryv/repairman_put_407c_in_my_r22_system/
13. HCFC Air Conditioning Retrofit Guidelines HCFC-22 to Genetron® 422D – Honeywell Advanced Materials, accessed June 27, 2025, https://advancedmaterials.honeywell.com/content/dam/advancedmaterials/en/documents/document-lists/refrigerants/technical/pmt-sustainability-genetron-hcfc-ac-retrofit-hcfc22-to-hfc422d-hfc407c-guidelines.pdf
14. NATIONAL REFRIGERANTS – R22 Alternative Options Guide, accessed June 27, 2025, https://nationalref.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/R22_Alternatives.pdf
15. R-422B and R-422D – National Refrigerants, Inc., accessed June 27, 2025, https://refrigerants.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/R422D_RefGuid.pdf
16. R424A – National Refrigerants Ltd, accessed June 27, 2025, https://nationalref.com/products/r424a/
17. Refrigerant Products | R422B | HFC, accessed June 27, 2025, https://refrigerants.com/product/r422b/
18. SERVICE AND RETROFIT ALTERNATIVES – R22 – Gas2Go, accessed June 27, 2025, https://gas2go.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Service-Retrofit-Alternatives-R22.pdf
19. RETROFIT PROCEDURE FOR REPLACING R22 WITH RS-44b …, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.replacementforr22.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/RS-44b_Conversion_Guide.pdf
20. Retrofitting R-22 Systems with Forane® 427A – Refrigerant, accessed June 27, 2025, https://forane.arkema.com/files/live/sites/shared_arkema/files/downloads/fluorochemicals/Forane%20Retrofit%20Guidelines-4-2022.pdf
21. 8 Simple Steps to Retrofit an R-22 System with Freon™ MO99 (R-438A) – Chemours, accessed June 27, 2025, http://pages.chemours.com/3_cooling_seasons_left.html
22. R-438A – Climalife, accessed June 27, 2025, https://climalife.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/uploadsproductmediadocumentr438a-fd-en-17-5.pdf
23. ComStar – Refrigerants – R22 Replacement, Product Article – ChemPoint.com, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.chempoint.com/insights/comstar-refrigerant-faqs-facts
24. www.dayan-rs.com, accessed June 27, 2025, http://www.dayan-rs.com/en/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/1763.pdf
25. Freon™, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.edssupply.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/R-22-Replacement-Products.pdf
26. Why R-438A (MO99) Is the Best R-22 Replacement – Chemours 25 lb Cylinder Guide., accessed June 27, 2025, https://royalrefrigerants.com/blogs/news/why-r-438a-mo99
27. Freon™ MO29 (R-422D) Refrigerant | R-22 Replacement, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.freon.com/en/products/refrigerants/mo29
28. Freon™ MO99™ (R-438A) and Freon™ NU-22B™ (R-422B), accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.freon.com/es/-/media/files/freon/freon-mo99-nu22b-retrofit-guidelines.pdf?rev=cb47ceae0ca247879c21e65941aa1546
29. Replacement for R22 – Replacement For R22, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.replacementforr22.com/
30. Converting R-22 Systems to R-453A | 2018-01-08 | ACHRNEWS, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.achrnews.com/articles/136256-converting-r-22-systems-to-r-453a
31. RS-44b Refrigerant, 24 Pound Cylinder, Drop In Replacement for …, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.refrigerantdepot.com/product/rs-44b-refrigerant-drop-in-replacement-for-r22/
32. Techniques and Regulations for the Safe Handling of Flammable Hydrocarbon and Hydrofluoroolefin Refrigerants – Mainstream Engineering, accessed June 27, 2025, https://ww2.epatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/HC-HFO-Manual.pdf
33. R-422B 25 lb (NU22) Refrigerant: The Ideal R-22 Replacement for HVAC Professionals., accessed June 27, 2025, https://royalrefrigerants.com/blogs/news/r-422b-25-lb-nu22-refrigerant
34. refrigerant fact sheet – r422d – Gas2Go, accessed June 27, 2025, https://gas2go.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/202202-Fact-Sheet-R422D.pdf
35. Performance assessment of alternate refrigerants for retrofitting R22 based air conditioning system – SciSpace, accessed June 27, 2025, https://scispace.com/pdf/performance-assessment-of-alternate-refrigerants-for-12gon1u4te.pdf
36. (PDF) Performance assessment of alternate refrigerants for retrofitting R22 based air conditioning system – ResearchGate, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312271600_Performance_assessment_of_alternate_refrigerants_for_retrofitting_R22_based_air_conditioning_system
37. Retrofitting R-22 Systems – Technical Training Associates, accessed June 27, 2025, https://techtrainassoc.com/free-hvacr-technician-training-resources/hvacr-resources-and-information/hvacr-industry-articles/retrofitting-r-22-systems/
38. Best replacement refrigerant for R22? : r/HVAC – Reddit, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/HVAC/comments/1bzizkn/best_replacement_refrigerant_for_r22/
39. R421A 25 lbs cylinders | mysite – ac supply, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.jjacsupply.com/product-page/r421a-25-lbs-cylinders
40. R421A Technical Information – A-Gas, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.agas.com/media/hzedknei/r421a-technical-information.pdf
41. Forane R-22 Refrigerant retrofit solutions | Arkema Forane, accessed June 27, 2025, https://forane.arkema.com/en/forane-refrigerants/forane-retrofits/retrofit-solutions/
42. Forane® 427A – Arkema, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.arkema.com/global/en/products/product-finder/product/fluorochemicals/forane427a/
43. Forane ® 427A (R427A) – The EASY RETROFIT, accessed June 27, 2025, https://forane.arkema.com/en/forane-refrigerants/forane-retrofits/
44. Forane® 427A retrofit guides, accessed June 27, 2025, https://forane.arkema.com/en/forane-refrigerants/forane-retrofits/forane-427a-retrofit-guides/
45. (R-458A) – NET, accessed June 27, 2025, https://lockeproductionblob.blob.core.windows.net/storage/products/attachments/2022/03/10/192ff1463b947f8dc4a15490599e5516.pdf
46. Bluon TDX20 564374 – Capitol Group, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.capitolgroupinc.com/830815/product/n/bluon-564374
47. RS-44 – RS CoolRS Cool – Refrigerant Services Inc., accessed June 27, 2025, http://rscool.com/rs-44/
48. www.wensui.us, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.wensui.us/industrial-chiller-refrigerant-selection-guide-core-differences-between-r22-and-r407c-practical-decision-making/#:~:text=R407C%3A%20As%20a%20zeotropic%20mixture,transfer%20efficiency%20in%20evaporators%2Fcondensers.
49. PDF Retrofit Handbook – National Refrigerants, Inc., accessed June 27, 2025, https://refrigerants.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/NRI_RetroftHndBk.pdf
50. Honeywell’s Detailed Guide to Retrofitting R-22 AC Units – MCAA, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.mcaa.org/smart_sol_article/honeywells-detailed-guide-retrofitting-r-22-ac-units/
51. R22 Refrigerant Replacements – Drop-In & Recharge, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.refrigerantguys.com/r22-refrigerant-replacements-s/159.htm
52. Disposable NU-22B (R422B) 25 lb. Cylinder – Best Price – Refrigerant Guys, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.refrigerantguys.com/NU-22B-R422B-R22-Replacement-p/111029b.htm
53. The Catch 22 of R22 Replacements – IIAR, accessed June 27, 2025, https://iiarcondenser.org/the-catch-22-of-r22-replacements/
54. A REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE REFRIGERANTS FOR R22, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.journal-dogorangsang.in/no_4_Book_21/152.pdf
55. R22 Refrigerant / Outdated AC system : r/homeowners – Reddit, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/homeowners/comments/1cc3yye/r22_refrigerant_outdated_ac_system/
56. Freon Refrigerant R422B, 25lb. Jug (R22 Replacement) – Budget Heating & Air Conditioning, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.budgetheating.com/Freon-Refrigerant-R422B-25lb-jug-R22-replace-p/26005.htm
57. DYNATEMP R-407C 25LB CYLINDER R22 RETRO MEDIUM TEMP REFRIGERATION – Wallington Plumbing and Heating Supply Inc, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.wallingtonplumbingsupply.com/buy/product/dynatemp-r-407c-25lb-cylinder-r22-retro-medium-temp-refrigeration-wallington-plumbing-and-heating-supply-inc/1293597
58. R438A 25 lb sealed | mysite – ac supply, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.jjacsupply.com/product-page/r438a-25-lb-sealed
59. R-422B (NU-22) Refrigerant 25 LB – CoolmateGas, accessed June 27, 2025, https://coolmategas.com/products/r-422b-nu-22-refrigerant-25-lb
60. R-422D MO29 Refrigerant 25 lb. – eRefrigerants.com, accessed June 27, 2025, https://erefrigerants.com/products/r-422d-mo29-refrigerant-25-lb
61. R-422D MO29 Refrigerant 25 LB – CoolmateGas, accessed June 27, 2025, https://coolmategas.com/products/r-422d-mo29-refrigerant-25-lb
62. R-421A Refrigerant 25 lb. – eRefrigerants.com, accessed June 27, 2025, https://erefrigerants.com/products/r-421a-refrigerant-25-lb
63. Arkema R-427a Refrigerant, 25 Lb. Cylinder | HD Supply, accessed June 27, 2025, https://hdsupplysolutions.com/p/arkema-r-427a-refrigerant-25-lb-cylinder-p246471
64. r-427a refrigerant, 25 lb. cylinder – GS Supply!, accessed June 27, 2025, https://gulfstatessupply.com/ac-refrigeration-local-only-refrigerants-local-only-c-1414_1415_1418/r427a-refrigerant-25-lb-cylinder-p-25715.html
65. R-453A (RS-44B) Refrigerant 25 LB – CoolmateGas, accessed June 27, 2025, https://coolmategas.com/products/r-453a-rs-44b-refrigerant-25-lb
66. R-407C 25 lb Refrigerant New Factory Sealed Cylinder SAME BUSINESS DAY SHIPPING!, accessed June 27, 2025, https://royalrefrigerants.com/products/r-407c
67. R-407C Refrigerant 25 lb. – eRefrigerants.com, accessed June 27, 2025, https://erefrigerants.com/products/r-407c-refrigerant-25-lb
68. R-427A Refrigerant 25 lb. – eRefrigerants.com, accessed June 27, 2025, https://erefrigerants.com/products/r-427a-refrigerant-25-lb
69. R458A-25LB – Cosco Air Conditioning, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.coscohawaii.com/buy/product/r458a-25lb/CLENCd62c2923f26c305654c2e475bff783a5